Think you're too old to be competitive? Have a team you think is too old to be competitive? Think again! In this video I explain how and why age can lead to wins when it should be the younger competitor/team that claims success.

Here's my first vlog on the difference between tactics and strategy courtesy of 9-time grand slam champion Helen Jacobs, who wrote the book Tennis in 1941. 

An article appeared recently in a variety of news sources making bold claims: “Good Sports: Longer Lives Linked to Swimming, Racquetball” said one headline I saw. It wasn’t long before similar headlines bounced around social media as a means to justify participating in one sport or not participating in others. Essentially, the news article I read suggested that playing racquet sports and swimming leads to a longer life than if playing other sports such as soccer or participating in fitness classes.
 
But we have to be careful how we interpret journalistic headlines and we need to understand the background behind the scientific discovery. Having written so many scientific articles and seen journalists and others create “eye-catching” headlines from my work to manipulate what I wrote to catch the attention of their audience, I understand how dangerous this can be!
 
This is why athletes, coaches, and those working in sports organizations need to utilize the services of experts and scientists to take what science has discovered and interpret it and apply it correctly. Without doing so, mistakes or misinterpretations are made that can be costly. Although this headline above is just an example that I’m using, headlines like this show up all the time.

Let’s go back to the headline that I just mentioned. One would assume that the article then mentions racquetball right? Well, no, it doesn’t. At no point in the article did the writer reference racquetball again. Yet many people will assume that longer lives are linked to swimming and racquetball because of the headline. But that isn’t what the original research said!
 
Here is a link to the original scientific article. Within the article there are several mediating points that should be noted (there are more but these are the main ones in my opinion):

1. At no point in the original article is racquetball mentioned! The reference to “racquet sports” included badminton, tennis, and squash.
2. The study was conducted in the United Kingdom so its findings may be different in another country with a different climate or health system, for example.
3. Recall of physical activity (i.e., asking participants to describe their activity the four weeks prior) was limited to 4 weeks, and the authors note that it might not have been long enough. For example, if the survey was done in January, chances are that the participant didn’t cycle in the previous four weeks, but maybe they consider themselves to be a summer cyclist. Maybe they play squash in the winter months or don’t exercise at all. To their credit, the authors do mention this limitation.
4. Some sports, particularly racquet sports, are traditionally played by those with a higher socioeconomic status than those in other sports (e.g., they have to pay club memberships). Therefore, these participants may have more leisure time, access to better food and better healthcare, and simply live longer because of other factors not associated with the physical activity they engage in.

It’s difficult to make wholesale conclusions from one study, but media outlets do have a tendency to do this. They sensationalize information without clearly placing the information within the specific parameters in which the study was conducted.
 
My point is not to suggest that some sports are bad for you or that others are better for you. Really, the study’s actual findings aren’t that important for the point I’m trying to make. My point is to highlight how necessary it is to have scientific experts in your corner to provide guidance when you, your athlete, or your organization is trying to perform at an elite level.
 
Headlines are everywhere, especially when it comes to diet and nutrition, and taking information at face value can be detrimental to performance. Sports performance should be based on science, but it should be based on science that works and can be applied within the context of the experiment.
 
Be careful how you interpret headlines. Search for the facts, and if you need help, contact someone who can help you get it right, which ultimately leads to better outcomes. That’s what GOAT Sports Performance is all about: becoming the best you’re capable of becoming.